Food Subsidy to MP’s - Misplaced outrage.
Subsidizing food
in parliament canteen costs the Government of India around 15 crores as per the
reported RTI documents.
Let’s do a
simple math. I am not even counting hundreds of parliamentary, ministerial, MP’s
support staff who get benefited out of this subsidy, actually more than whom it
is actually subsidized for...the members of parliament.
A total of 790 parliamentarians
from both the houses enjoying a subsidy of mere Rs.16,000/- per MP per month, does not
warrant a national debate, certainly not a national outrage :-) especially when the subsidy the government is already extending for welfare of the poor & needy is over 3,00,000 crores.
The callous debates & subsequent outrage is disrespectful to the critical pillar of democracy
too, the ‘Legislature’.
The salary which an Indian MP gets is below his
counterparts even in the neighboring Asian countries, leave alone the west. The
food subsidy to parliamentarians is not just an Indian phenomenon.
The cost of benefits to MP’s in UK
costs a whopping 6.8 million pounds annually. The cost of salary & benefits to the Congress & House in USA costs over 4.5 Billion USD. India is nowhere close
to those staggering numbers neither in salaries to its MP's nor in extending benefits.
In a country
as diversified as India, the members of parliament come from varied backgrounds both socially & economically, to paint everyone with a single
brush and argue is not tenable. Neither the presumption that all the MP's are corrupt and they have alternate source of incomes is factual.
One
shouldn’t slight the sheer amount of time, energy, resources, mobility, travel,
communication, the role of a parliamentary representative demands. Apart from the session preparation, risks of libel, loss of family time, relationship conflicts, risk
of physical harm. In contrary to the general perception that an MP’s life is a
bed of roses & it’s all about power and protocol benefits, there's other side of the coin too which not many are fully aware.
While all
the four pillars are equally essential for a vibrant democracy, I certainly
feel 'legislature' gets financially compensated enormously less. Media being a 'private pillar' of the democracy in matured democracies like ours, the media
salaries are no comparison to, even Judiciary & Executive. Better financial
compensation to all the leaders of these four pillars can certainly help arresting corruption, at least to a level.
I strongly believe
when individuals can provide well for the general needs of their families, the
greed for more is contained marginally. The aversion to risk develops through financial stability the compensation provides. Providing well for the law
makers of a nation is not a bad investment, when especially good & clean governance, is
what we are expecting in return.
Food subsidy
is a non-issue, not just because it involves less amount of monetary burden,
also because of sheer logical reasons.
We cannot
compare commercial restaurant prices with the parliament’s canteen. The
commercial establishment’s profit margins on food range from 100% to 1000 %
depending on where you are eating.
A cup of coffee on a street side can cost a
citizen Rs.10, while the same in a 5 star restaurant can cost Rs.250. There’s
no logic in comparing them with a nonprofit, non-taxed, cost to cost system of
government canteens. That’s how the subsidy burden is low on the government.
On the same
lines, the golf clubs, constitutional clubs, media clubs, police clubs, public
sector canteens, military canteens do provide lower rates, as they work on cost
to cost without profit margins & they can afford to subsidize for the
benefit of their members.
It’s purely a 'cost - price - subsidy' reward
instrument & nothing to be outraged about.No one's looting anyone.
Mixing the
above with welfare subsidy to the poor & needy is comparing apples &
oranges. Does not make any sense.
Nevertheless, I
do believe in a country like India, where there are still persisting hunger
deaths, the government can conceptualize a subsidized food disbursal scheme on
the lines of what Tamilnadu Government is already doing. It can be one of the
solutions to provide for hungry & foodless.
- By Krishna Saagar Rao
Spokesperson BJP
******